Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://team.superadmission.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Unnati leads everything the platform has to connect to on the outside: institutions, counselling authorities, government stakeholders, and the families whose trust Superadmission needs to actually function.She Shaped the student-facing flows, administrative workflows, product thinking behind how an institution interacts with the system without losing autonomy. That is her domain.
Where it started
Before Superadmission, Unnati ran CollegeCult alongside Aashrut. She was not in a supporting role. She was doing the actual counselling: sitting with students, figuring out where they were getting lost, helping them build preference lists, walking through seat acceptance decisions one conversation at a time. That experience gave her something precise: a detailed, firsthand operational record of where the process fails students, at which step, and why. Not a general sense that the system is difficult. The exact moments it loses people. She also took every parent call. That matters more than it sounds. Parents going through their child’s admissions for the first time are among the most demanding people you will ever speak with. Anxious, often unfamiliar with how any of this works, sometimes navigating a language barrier or a significant information gap. Unnati handled those conversations consistently, without a script, and built the kind of trust that kept families coming back and referring others. The same quality she brought to those calls is what she now brings to institutional partner meetings and government relations conversations.What she built at Superadmission
Her contribution spans both product and operations. The two are hard to separate because her most significant product decisions came directly from her time on the ground.Student-facing product design
Student-facing product design
Designed the end-to-end student journey on the platform: the application flow, choice-filling interface, guidance touchpoints, and the language and structure of every decision prompt a student encounters. The design principle throughout was consistent: if a first-generation student from a small town can navigate this without help, it works. If not, it is not done yet.
Institutional and administrative workflow design
Institutional and administrative workflow design
Researched the intake process from the institution side by speaking directly with admissions officers: understanding their actual workload, where coordination broke down, and what a well-designed administrative workflow needed to do for officers to trust it. The institutional workflows in Superadmission, including how colleges receive pre-verified student records and track seat fill in real time, came out of that primary research.
Institutional partnerships and government relations
Institutional partnerships and government relations
Leads Superadmission’s relationships with counselling authorities, institutional partners, and government stakeholders. Manages alignment with NEP 2020 implementation bodies and the policy conversations that determine whether a platform like this gets adopted at scale or stays a prototype.
Pilot program coordination
Pilot program coordination
Coordinating the cross-functional pilot launch across engineering, policy, and design, ensuring regulatory compliance and keeping the build aligned with what the research actually showed.
How she approaches the work
Two things define how Unnati works, and they do not always coexist easily: operational discipline and genuine care for the person on the other side of the screen. The discipline shows up in how she moves. She is thorough and consistent in a way that is unusual when everything is moving fast and it is easy to cut corners. The care shows up in what she optimises for. When something is unclear, her instinct is to go speak with whoever is affected, not reason about them from a distance. That combination is what makes her product decisions hold up. The student flows she designed are not based on assumptions. They are built from hundreds of real conversations with students who were confused, stressed, or about to make the wrong choice. She knows where the friction is because she sat with people while they were experiencing it. She also learns fast and openly. The government relations work she leads now is not something she arrived with deep experience in. She built it by doing it, by attending the right conversations, asking the right questions, and treating unfamiliarity as a reason to prepare harder rather than to step back. That orientation is one of the most valuable qualities in anyone working at the intersection of technology and public policy. It is why stakeholders trust her.Background
Academics
NATA Score: 152Strong consistent academic record across analytical and creative disciplines
Debate and public speaking
Behes National Debate Competition: Best Speaker AwardNational-level competitive debater. The same clarity of argument she brings to investor and government conversations.
In her words
The students who need this platform most are the ones who will never ask for help navigating a broken system. They will just quietly get a worse outcome than they deserved. Building something that removes that gap entirely, not for some students but for all of them, is the only version of this work that feels worth doing.